Pandora’s Hope. Essays on the Reality of Science Studies.

The present ecological mutation has organized the whole political landscape for the last thirty years. This could explain the deadly cocktail of exploding inequalities, massive deregulation, and conversion of the dream of globalization into a nightmare for most people.

In Pandora's Hope, Bruno Latour is resolute in his efforts to (1) understand the mire philosophers of language have found themselves in, and (2) move on past those chimeras of epistemological impossibilities toward a richer understanding of things by scrutinizing the very practice of science and shaking loose the foundations presupposed by realist and social constructivist frameworks. This.

Buy Pandora's Hope: An Essay on the Reality of Science Studies by Latour, Bruno (May 28, 1999) Paperback by (ISBN: ) from Amazon's Book Store. Everyday low prices and free delivery on eligible orders.

In this book, Bruno Latour gives us his most philosophically informed book since Science in Action. Through case studies of scientists in the Amazon analyzing soil and in Pasteur's lab studying the fermentation of lactic acid, he shows us the myriad steps by which events in the material world are transformed into items of scientific knowledge. Through many examples in the world of technology.

An extended review is presented of Bruno Latour's book Aramis, or the Love of Technology (Harvard University Press, 1996). Attention is paid to the textual style and strategies in the book, and also to how it fits in with, and exemplifies, many of the more abstract claims central to Latour's actor-network theory. In particular, consideration is given to the provocative arguments in the book.

Bruno Latour (1947) is a sociologist of science best known for his books We Have Never Been Modern, Laboratory Life, and Science in Action. Contents. 1 Works. 1.1 Monographs; 1.2 Selected works; 1.3 Essays; 2 Conversations and interviews; 3 Literature; 4 Links; Works. The works are in French unless noted. The links following respective editions point to their online versions; where no file.

In Bruno Latour’s “Agency at the Time of the Anthropocene,” the French multidisciplinary philosopher associates the importance of the Anthropocene epoch to humans by accentuating the fact that humans are quasi-subjects and have lost their autonomy. We distribute agency while also being acted on by other subjects; he claims that notion as the all-encompassing, distinctive quality that.

Bruno Latour. Much of today’s discussion concerned an early work of Latour, the book Laboratory Life: the Construction of Scientific Facts co-authored with Steve Woolgar. In the book, the authors undertake a study of a scientific research laboratory using the methods of anthropology. They make two major observations; first that laboratory process is deeply a process of inscription i.e. all.

What Is Bruno Latour's Iconoclash Essay About Discuss your paper’s details via our messaging system. Check and modify it at any stage, from an outline to the final version. Check and modify it at any stage, from an outline to the final version.

This essay argues the chaotic, violent, and truly Lucretian implications of Michel Serres’s attack on the Empire of Signs is moderated and localized by Bruno Latour—figured more as a digital field or network than as the meteorology of “deep wells, chimneys of thunderous acceleration, rendings, gaps” that Serres associates with the unpredictable drift of modernity. Latour tries to.

As soon as I brush up on it, I'll write something about actor-network theory (created by Latour) References: Bruno Latour and Steve Woolgar, Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts, (Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1986). Bruno Latour, The Pasteurization of France, (Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 1988).